Rube Goldberg Architecture: When Overcomplication Meets Inclusive Design in Malaysia

Details

Parent Category: Legislation

 

Imagine a building where opening a door doesn't just swing a panel—it triggers a gentle cascade: a marble rolls down a ramp, nudges a lever, releases a soft pulley system, and finally illuminates a welcoming light for a wheelchair user at the entrance. Overly complicated? Perhaps. But in the spirit of Rube Goldberg—the legendary American cartoonist famous for his delightfully convoluted machines that perform the simplest tasks—this kind of playful complexity can spark fresh thinking about accessibility and universal design in Malaysian architecture.

Rube Goldberg machines are intentionally elaborate contraptions using everyday physics (dominoes, ramps, pulleys, gravity) to achieve basic goals like turning on a light or pouring coffee. While real buildings rarely incorporate literal chain reactions (safety and efficiency rule the day), the philosophy behind them—creative problem-solving, sequential thinking, and delight in motion—offers valuable lessons for architects and developers crafting inclusive spaces in Malaysia.

Why Rube Goldberg Thinking Matters for Malaysian Inclusive Design

In Malaysia, the built environment must serve everyone: the over 821,000 registered OKU (Orang Kurang Upaya), elderly residents, families with young children, and visitors alike. The current standard, MS 1184:2014 – Universal Design and Accessibility in the Built Environment – Code of Practice (Second Revision), promotes barrier-free access that benefits all users, aligning with the Persons with Disabilities Act 2008 and UBBL By-Law 34A.

Traditional approaches sometimes feel "overcomplicated" in the wrong way—retrofits added piecemeal, ramps too steep, or lifts hidden away—leading to exclusion rather than inclusion. Rube Goldberg-inspired creativity flips this: it encourages architects to think step-by-step about user journeys, ensuring every element (from tactile paving to adjustable counters) works in harmony like a well-orchestrated chain reaction.

For example:

• Entrances as "starting triggers": A level threshold with integrated tactile indicators and gentle ramps (maximum 1:12 gradient per MS 1184:2014) can "trigger" seamless access, much like the first domino in a chain.
• Circulation paths as "sequential steps": Wide corridors (minimum 1.2m clear), handrails on both sides, and visual/auditory cues create a smooth flow—preventing the "breakdowns" that frustrate OKU users.
• Interactive elements for delight: Some modern public spaces worldwide incorporate kinetic features (moving sculptures or responsive lighting) that engage users playfully while meeting accessibility needs. In Malaysia, this could inspire inclusive playgrounds or mosque courtyards with subtle, culturally sensitive motion elements that guide rather than obstruct.

Real-World Inspirations: From Whimsy to Practical Inclusion

While no Malaysian building is a full Rube Goldberg contraption, echoes appear in kinetic art installations and interactive public designs across Asia. Think of responsive facades or water features that react to movement—principles that could enhance accessible wayfinding in places like Kuala Lumpur's public plazas or university campuses.

Closer to home, our accessibility audits often reveal opportunities for "chain-reaction" improvements: one small adjustment (e.g., better signage with braille and high-contrast visuals) triggers better overall usability, just as a single pulley can set an entire machine in motion.

Lessons for Architects and Developers in Malaysia

1. Embrace sequential user experience — Map journeys like a chain reaction: What happens first? How does one feature support the next? This mindset ensures compliance with MS 1184:2014 while adding delight.
2. Prioritize simplicity in complexity — Rube Goldberg machines are fun because they're excessive; accessible design succeeds when "excess" complexity is stripped away, leaving elegant, intuitive solutions.
3. Incorporate playfulness sensitively — In culturally rich Malaysia, interactive or kinetic elements must respect heritage (e.g., in mosques or heritage sites) while promoting inclusion for OKU.

As accessibility consultants with a dedicated presence in Kuala Lumpur, we help architects, developers, and institutions turn these ideas into reality—through audits, design guidance, and compliance reports that blend MS 1184:2014 with practical, cost-effective retrofits.

Ready to Build More Inclusive Spaces?

Whether you're designing a new school, retrofitting a commercial building, or upgrading a public facility, let's create environments where every "step" leads to inclusion—not exclusion. Contact us for a free initial consultation.

 

In the end, true universal design isn't about overcomplication—it's about making the simple act of participation effortless and joyful for everyone in Malaysia. Let's chain-react toward a more inclusive built environment.

Keeping the Family Whole: The Jones Family’s Creative Quest for NDIS SDA Housing

Details

Parent Category: Articles

 

Keeping the Family Whole: The Jones Family’s Creative Quest for NDIS SDA Housing

In a perfect world, a family facing disability wouldn’t have to choose between specialist housing and staying together. For the Jones family — a husband and wife with their teenage daughter — that choice feels very real. The husband is eligible for NDIS Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) in the Fully Accessible category, in Australia's NDIS Specialist Disability Accomodation program, yet finding a home that works for all three of them has proven far harder than expected.

This is their story so far — and the practical, hopeful strategies they’re pursuing to build a future where accessibility doesn’t mean separation.

The Challenge: SDA Eligibility Meets Family Life

Under the NDIS, Fully Accessible SDA is designed for people with significant physical impairments, typically wheelchair users or those needing high levels of mobility support. These homes feature step-free entry, wide doorways and corridors, roll-in showers, adjustable benches, and space for assistive technology and support workers.

The problem? Traditional SDA models often assume group or individual living arrangements that don’t easily accommodate spouses and children. Many families are forced to consider separate housing, which fragments daily life, increases emotional strain, and adds logistical complexity — especially with a teenager still at home.

The Jones family refuses to accept that outcome. They want one property where they can live as a unit, with the husband’s SDA needs fully met and the wife and daughter comfortable and supported.

Practical Solutions on the Table

After months of searching, their support team (including the author of this piece) has narrowed the focus to three realistic pathways:

1. Building a new home from the ground up. This offers the greatest control. A purpose-designed home can incorporate Fully Accessible features throughout while creating private and shared family spaces. It’s the gold standard for compliance with the NDIS SDA Design Standard, but it requires suitable land, time, and capital, at Sydney's exorbitant prices.

2. Buying a new 3-bedroom apartment and retrofitting. Some newer apartments can be adapted by converting a bedroom into additional accessible circulation space or modifying wet areas. This provides a more compact, low-maintenance option in urban areas with good services. However, body corporate rules, lift access, and the cost of bringing an entire unit up to full SDA enrolment standards can face insurmountable hurdles.

3. The “House + Villa” model (currently gaining strong momentum). Buy a manageable existing house for the wife and daughter, then construct a compliant SDA villa (a standalone or semi-attached dwelling) at the rear of the property. The villa would be built and enrolled to Fully Accessible standards, providing the husband with dedicated, high-quality accommodation while keeping the family on the same block.

This approach is particularly promising. Australian planning rules in most states now support secondary dwellings (granny flats or accessory dwellings), though approvals vary by council and state. In many cases, a well-designed villa can be enrolled as SDA, delivering the funding and accessibility the husband needs without forcing the family apart.

Game-Changing Rule: Appendix H

A lesser-known but powerful provision is making family unity far more achievable: Appendix H in the NDIS SDA Pricing Arrangements.

Introduced and refined in recent years, Appendix H allows an SDA-eligible participant to live with non-SDA family members (spouse, children, partners) in a compliant dwelling. The NDIS adjusts funding to support the shared arrangement, recognising that accessibility should not require family separation.

This opens the door for the Jones family to potentially live all together in one high-quality, Fully Accessible home — or to use the house-plus-villa model with easy daily connection. It’s a quiet policy win that’s already helping many families stay intact.

Why This Matters Beyond One Family

The Jones family’s search highlights a broader gap in the NDIS housing landscape. While SDA has delivered excellent purpose-built homes for many participants, family-inclusive options remain limited. Creative solutions like on-site villas, thoughtful retrofits, and full use of Appendix H are showing what’s possible when families, support coordinators, builders, and planners collaborate.

For other families in similar situations, the message is clear:

• Start early with an SDA-experienced planner or advocate.
• Engage accredited SDA assessors, architects and specialist builders from the design stage.
• Understand your state’s rules on secondary dwellings — they’re more flexible than many realise.
• Explore ownership models, including working with SDA providers who support participant or family ownership.

The Search Continues — With Hope

The Jones family hasn’t found their perfect property yet, but they’re moving forward with determination and practical options on the table. Whether it’s a new build, a smart apartment conversion, or the house-plus-villa solution, they’re committed to a home that works for everyone.

Housing is more than bricks and mortar — it’s the foundation of family life, independence, and dignity. The Jones family’s story is a reminder that with creativity, persistence, and the right knowledge of NDIS rules, families don’t have to choose between specialist support and staying together.

We’ll keep following their journey. If you’re facing similar challenges, know that solutions exist — and you’re not alone in the search.

Names have been changed to protect privacy. This article is based on a real ongoing case and current NDIS rules as of 2026.

If you’re supporting a family through SDA housing challenges or navigating this yourself, feel free to reach out — stories like the Jones family’s help all of us learn and improve the system.

From Mousetrap Mayhem to Schoolyard Ingenuity: The Lost Art of Playful Design

Details

Parent Category: Articles

From Mousetrap Mayhem to Schoolyard Ingenuity: The Lost Art of Playful Design

Back in the 1960s, kids across the world (including this author) spent hours building wildly elaborate contraptions in the classic board game Mousetrap. Originally released by Ideal Toy Company in 1963 and inspired by Rube Goldberg's cartoonish chain-reaction machines, the game turned a simple marble into a hilarious cascade of tipping buckets, swinging boots, and a final cage drop. It was pure mechanical joy —part engineering, part slapstick comedy. (Later editions appeared under Mattel/Hasbro branding, which is why many remember it that way.)

 

Fast-forward to the early 2000s. As architects working on upgrades for New South Wales public-school toilet blocks, we faced a very different kind of chain reaction: the daily chaos of hundreds of students, harsh weather, and the relentless forces of graffiti, vandalism, and neglect. The brief was clear and demanding:
• Robust materials that could withstand kicks, knocks, and years of heavy use
• Easy-to-clean surfaces (no hidden crevices for grime)
• High-security fixtures and vandal-proof hardware
• Graffiti-resistant coatings
• Excellent natural lighting and cross-ventilation
• A generous number of cubicles for both boys and girls to cut down on queues

We delivered dozens of these facilities across Sydney and regional NSW. They were functional, durable, and by the standards of the day—quite progressive. But one recurring headache stuck in everyone's mind: tennis balls. Every school seemed to have a roof or gutter system that acted like a magnet for stray balls from the playground. They lodged in downpipes, blocked drains, and turned routine maintenance into an endless game of retrieval. Gutter-cleaning crews in Australian schools still report staggering numbers of tennis balls, soccer balls, and other projectiles every year.

One project in particular became legendary in our office. The site sat in a precinct where a certain Australian Prime Minister lived at the time. The deadline was tight, the scrutiny high, and the tennis-ball problem was especially acute. Instead of the usual pitched roof with standard gutters, we designed a custom roof profile that turned the problem into delight. No matter where a tennis ball landed, the gentle slopes and curved channels would funnel it safely back to a single collection point at ground level-separated from leaves and rainwater. It was a quiet Rube Goldberg moment in architecture: a single, elegant gesture that solved a practical nuisance while injecting a spark of fun into an otherwise utilitarian building.

 

We thought we were brilliant, of course. Architect's designs need to stick around for say a hundred years, whereas a 30-second advertisement is a fleeting concept. The fact is, we architects have to be overly arrogant to believe that we can impose our ideas on society for the lifetime of a building. But hey, it comes with the job, and the kids would love it. Maintenance would be simpler. And it cost next to nothing extra.

Alas, conservative minds prevailed. "Something more traditional would be more suitable," we were told. The playful roof was shelved, and we delivered a sensible, pitched-roof solution with conventional gutters and downpipes. It worked perfectly—secure, well-ventilated, easy to clean, and appropriately discreet for its high-profile location. But it lacked that spark. I know other high-profile architects would tip their hats and walk away rather than compromise their vision. I guess that's the difference between a fountainhead and a seasoned practitioner. Our job at the end of the day is to make our government client representatives look good. That idea, we fully embrace without regret. Our plans get built.

Looking back, the episode feels emblematic of a broader tension in public architecture. We design for safety, durability, and cost-effectiveness—and rightly so. Yet we too rarely leave room for joy, whimsy, or the small surprises that make everyday spaces memorable. The Mousetrap roof would have been a gentle reminder that buildings don't have to be solemn
 to be serious. A ball returned safely to the playground instead of being trapped in a pipe is a tiny victory for cleverness over conformity.

There are encouraging exceptions today—playful rolling-ball installations in public plazas, undulating roofs that invite interaction, even schools with climbing walls and colour-coded wayfinding that turn navigation into a game. But we could use far more of that spirit.

So here's a modest proposal: the next time you're specifying a roof, a playground, or a public facility, ask yourself—could a little Mousetrap logic make it better? A chain reaction that ends, not in capture, but in delight.

Because good design doesn't just work. Sometimes, it should also make you smile.

FAQ – Playful Design & Rube Goldberg Architecture

What is Rube Goldberg architecture? It applies chain-reaction principles to buildings, using motion and mechanics to solve problems in engaging, often humorous ways.

Why do tennis balls get stuck in school gutters? Playground activity sends balls onto roofs, where standard gutters trap them, leading to frequent blockages.

How can playful design improve school bathroom facilities? Features like better drainage, natural light, ventilation, and subtle interactive elements enhance durability, hygiene, and user experience.

Where can I learn more about the Mousetrap game? The Wikipedia entry on Mouse Trap offers a detailed history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mouse_Trap_(board_game)

 

Enforcement Challenges: Malaysia vs Singapore vs Australia Accessibility Standards in the Built Environment

Details

Parent Category: Legislation

Enforcement Challenges: Malaysia vs Singapore vs Australia Accessibility Standards in the Built Environment

Disability access Malaysia | Accessibility enforcement Malaysia Singapore Australia | MS 1184 enforcement challenges | BCA Code accessibility Singapore | AS 1428 enforcement Australia | Barrier-free infrastructure compliance | Universal design enforcement issues | Wheelchair access audit Malaysia | Accessibility consultant services Malaysia Sydney Perth

Malaysia, Singapore, and Australia all maintain robust accessibility frameworks for the built environment, but enforcement approaches vary significantly in strength, consistency, and outcomes. Singapore's Code on Accessibility in the Built Environment 2025 (BCA, effective November 1, 2025) is mandatory and tightly integrated into approvals. Australia's AS 1428.1:2021 (Design for Access and Mobility) is referenced by the Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards 2010 (Premises Standards) under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA), making it effectively mandatory for new builds and major renovations via the National Construction Code (NCC). Malaysia's MS 1184:2014 (Universal Design and Accessibility – Code of Practice) supports the Uniform Building By-Laws (UBBL) and Persons with Disabilities Act 2008 (PwD Act), but enforcement remains inconsistent despite strong guidelines.

These differences impact developers, architects, owners, and OKU/PwD communities. Singapore and Australia achieve higher baseline compliance through structured enforcement, while Malaysia faces gaps that advocacy seeks to close via 2026 PwD Act amendments.

Enforcement in Singapore: Mandatory, Proactive, and Consistent

Singapore's BCA Code is a legal requirement under the Building Control Act:

• Integrated into building approvals – non-compliance prevents TOP/CSC issuance.
• Regular inspections, stakeholder consultations, and 2025 updates enhance flexibility while maintaining strict access (e.g., ramps, tactile indicators).
• Strong industry adoption and resources minimize gaps.
• Challenges: Retrofits in older buildings can be costly, but overall enforcement is effective, supporting high inclusion levels.

Enforcement in Australia: Mandatory via Federal Standards, with State Variations

Australia's Premises Standards (2010, updated references to AS 1428.1:2021) make AS 1428 mandatory where triggered by the NCC/BCA:

• Applies to new buildings, major refurbishments, and public premises – compliance required for building certification.
• Enforced through state/territory building authorities, certifiers, and the Australian Human Rights Commission (via DDA complaints).
• Regular reviews (e.g., 2024 compilation updates) and deemed-to-satisfy provisions ensure clarity.
• Challenges: Inconsistent application in heritage buildings, "unjustifiable hardship" defences, awareness gaps among smaller owners, and complaints processes that can be resource-intensive for individuals with disabilities. Advocacy highlights ongoing barriers in existing structures despite strong new-build enforcement.

Enforcement Challenges in Malaysia: Strong Standards, Variable Implementation

Malaysia emphasizes universal design via MS 1184:2014 (tied to UBBL By-Law 34A) and PwD Act Section 26:

• Guidelines for approvals, but MS 1184 is often treated as a code of practice rather than strictly mandatory.
• Local authorities (e.g., DBKL) handle enforcement variably – limited inspections, penalties, or follow-up.
• PwD Act lacks robust penalties, timelines, and redress; described as "toothless" in advocacy.
• Systemic issues: Awareness gaps, retrofitting difficulties, and inconsistent audits lead to persistent barriers (e.g., uneven walkways, missing ramps).
• Advocacy push: Suara16% and others call for enforceable standards, transparency, and alignment with CRPD – 2026 amendments offer potential for stronger mechanisms.

Comparative Insights: Why the Differences Matter

• Singapore: Strict integration yields seamless compliance and inclusive outcomes.
• Australia: Federal mandates ensure high new-build standards, but heritage/existing buildings pose challenges similar to Malaysia's retrofits.
• Malaysia: Flexible approach allows adaptation but risks non-compliance due to weak follow-through – opportunities for improvement via amendments.

Universal design across all three benefits everyone – elderly, families, prams – with cost-effective long-term gains.

AccessConsultants.asia: Bridging Standards Across Malaysia, Sydney & Perth

As expert accessibility consultants, we deliver practical audits blending MS 1184 (Malaysia), BCA Code (Singapore insights), and AS 1428 (Australia) – culturally sensitive for Malaysian projects, high-spec for Sydney/Perth. Gary Finn's 40+ years (NSW Architect #5774, ACAA #435) in inclusive design ensures cost-effective barrier-free infrastructure solutions.

Whether navigating Malaysia's evolving enforcement, benchmarking against Singapore/Australia, or preparing for 2026 changes, proactive audits mitigate risks and foster inclusion.

Call to Action: Dealing with cross-border compliance or enforcement gaps? Book a free wheelchair access audit consultation at AccessConsultants.asia today. Professional services in Malaysia, Sydney, and Perth – let's achieve true accessibility.

Sources: BCA Code 2025, AS 1428.1:2021 & Premises Standards updates, MS 1184:2014, PwD Act analyses, advocacy reports (2025-2026), comparative studies. SEO optimised for accessibility enforcement Malaysia Singapore Australia, MS 1184 vs BCA vs AS 1428, barrier-free compliance challenges.

PwD Act Amendments 2026: Supporting the Government’s Commitment to Inclusion – The Value of Open Dialogue and Practical Audits

Details

Parent Category: Articles

 

PwD Act Amendments 2026: Supporting the Government’s Commitment to Inclusion – The Value of Open Dialogue and Practical Audits

Disability access Malaysia | PwD Act amendments 2026 | OKU rights Malaysia | Universal design Malaysia | Barrier-free infrastructure | Wheelchair access audit Malaysia | Accessibility consultant services Malaysia Sydney Perth

The Malaysian Government continues to show strong leadership in advancing inclusion for Persons with Disabilities (OKU/PwD). Deputy Minister Lim Hui Ying’s confirmation in January 2026 that revisions to the Persons with Disabilities Act 2008 (PwD Act or Akta Orang Kurang Upaya 2008) are being finalised for tabling in Parliament’s first sitting reflects a clear commitment to strengthening protections and participation for over 821,000 registered OKU nationwide.

Recent thoughtful contributions in media outlets such as MySinchew (February 9, 2026) and Borneo Post (February 5, 2026) have emphasised the importance of open dialogue and stakeholder involvement in this process. These align with the Madani spirit of collaboration, transparency, and collective progress – values that support the Government’s efforts to create meaningful, practical improvements in accessibility and inclusion.

Building on Positive Momentum

The Government’s ongoing work, including the drafting of national guidelines for PwD-friendly mosques and surau (announced February 7, 2026 by Minister Dr Zulkifli Hasan under the Action Plan for Muslim PwDs), demonstrates a proactive approach to making community and religious spaces more welcoming. These initiatives complement Budget 2026’s significant investments – RM1.4 billion for OKU support and expanded tax relief – and set a strong foundation for enforceable standards that benefit everyone.

Open engagement with OKU communities, carers, NGOs, architects, developers, and mosque committees will help ensure the amendments deliver real-world impact: enforceable accessibility requirements, reasonable accommodations, and clear pathways for compliance in buildings, transport, education, and public spaces.

Practical Contributions: Access Audits Supporting National Goals

Professional access audits play a vital role in translating policy intent into tangible improvements. The AccessConsultants.asia team brings extensive expertise to this work, with full-time members dedicated to Malaysia since 2018 and beyond.

Ahmad Syafiq bin Mohd Unzir (Graduate Architect, LAM AG/A 846, PAM G5078; Certificate IV in Access Consulting equivalency) has been a full-time team member since 2018. He conducted an access audit at Masjid Jamek (Masjid Jamek Sultan Abdul Samad) in Kuala Lumpur, supported by the Persatuan Akitek Malaysia (PAM) Social and Corporate Responsibility (SCR) Committee. Syafiq visited the mosque, met with the mosque’s AJK (Ahli Jawatankuasa or committee members) to discuss accessibility opportunities, and continued the conversation at a café with Dr Norwina to explore solutions in depth. These efforts have contributed to significant accessibility improvements at this historic and highly visited site – a practical example of how targeted audits can support national inclusion goals while respecting cultural and heritage values.

Nur Syuhada Binti Che Rahimi (Architectural Executive; Master of Architecture LAM & RIBA Part II) joined full-time in May 2019, bringing over seven years of specialised experience in disability accommodation, residential, and childcare projects under Australian regulations, aligned with Malaysian standards (MS 1184:2014). She excels in BIM documentation (Archicad highly proficient), authority submissions, and remote project coordination – skills that ensure seamless compliance and inclusive design delivery.

Daniel Wong (Principal Architect and Qualified Access Consultant; Diploma in Access Consulting 2017) has been integral to the team, with 25+ years in architecture and eleven years specialising in access consultancy. His background in inclusive and equitable design, housing for seniors and people with disabilities, and accessibility master planning – combined with pragmatic advice, sketches, performance solutions, and on-site inspections – adds invaluable depth to Malaysian projects.

These images illustrate inclusive public spaces in action – smooth, wide pathways, barrier-free routes, and accessible features that serve wheelchair users, families with prams, elderly worshippers, and the wider community. The same universal design principles apply directly to mosques, surau, and community buildings across Malaysia.

How We Can All Support the Government’s Vision

1. Engage Positively: Participate in consultations and share constructive feedback to help shape practical, effective amendments.
2. Conduct Access Audits: Baseline buildings and spaces against MS 1184/MS 1183 and international best practices (e.g., AS 1428.1) – identify opportunities for improvement in entrances, ablution areas, prayer zones, and pathways.
3. Implement Universal Design: Prioritise ramps (1:12 gradient), grab bars, tactile paving, braille signage, and accessible ablution facilities – features that benefit all users.
4. Partner with Experts: Work with accredited consultants to produce compliance reports and recommendations that support national guidelines and future enforcement.

AccessConsultants.asia: Proud to Support Malaysia’s Inclusion Journey

We provide practical, culturally sensitive accessibility consulting – always respectful of Malaysian values, heritage, and community needs. With Gary Finn’s 40+ years of experience (NSW Architect #5774, ACAA #435) in inclusive design, group homes, Specialist Disability Accommodation, and heritage projects – alongside Syafiq’s long-term dedication since 2018, Nur Syuhada’s specialised BIM and compliance expertise since 2019, and Daniel Wong’s architectural and access leadership – we deliver cost-effective barrier-free infrastructure solutions. Our expanding Perth office supports multi-state work, while Sydney expertise ensures high-standard audits.

 

PAM committee inspection at Masjid Jamek

The Government’s commitment to stronger OKU inclusion through PwD Act amendments and mosque guidelines is a positive step forward. Practical audits – as demonstrated at Masjid Jamek and beyond – help turn policy vision into accessible, welcoming spaces for all Malaysians.

Call to Action: Ready to support national inclusion goals with an access audit for your mosque, community centre, or building? Book a free wheelchair access audit consultation at AccessConsultants.asia today. Professional services available in Malaysia, Sydney, and Perth – together we build a more inclusive future.

Sources: MySinchew (Feb 9, 2026), Borneo Post (Feb 5, 2026), Bernama (Feb 7, 2026), team CVs and professional experience, advocacy updates. SEO optimised for PwD Act amendments 2026, OKU rights Malaysia, PwD-friendly mosques guidelines 2026, Masjid Jamek accessibility audit.